agentic publishing · governed federation

Editorial Review — Template

Editorial Review, in this template, is limited to the following inspected scope. Documented search, title/abstract screening, full-text assessment, and independent final inclusion decisions. Editors retain final responsibility for editorial decisions and confidentiality. The answer carries the source boundaries forward and does not infer authority from a neighboring topic.

Active canonical release · fedrelease_a65c787c8daccfe0606f729d6102e421 · exact revision sha256:3895724c5c31b99f7ca09eed28d46df5c6b08c5a6e0d9de9893938cdedf9d7dd

answer

Direct answer

Editorial Review, in this template, is limited to the following inspected scope. Documented search, title/abstract screening, full-text assessment, and independent final inclusion decisions. Editors retain final responsibility for editorial decisions and confidentiality. The answer carries the source boundaries forward and does not infer authority from a neighboring topic.

role-method

Template

Expose required fields, their authority, allowed values, and validation failures without pre-filling unknown evidence.

A complete-looking template must not manufacture review, rights, measurements, or release state.

Applied scope: Documented search, title/abstract screening, full-text assessment, and independent final inclusion decisions. Editors retain final responsibility for editorial decisions and confidentiality.

authority

Definition and operating context

The canonical concept owner is agentic-publishing. This route may apply release; it cannot redefine or inherit the authority of its canonical owner.

This property may publish publishing protocols, editorial templates, release guidance. It must not publish duplicate research records or unlabelled machine authorship.

evidence

Evidence and exact locators

Cochrane Handbook, Chapter 4: Searching for and selecting studies — Sections 4.5, 4.6.3 and 4.6.4. Establishes: Documented search, title/abstract screening, full-text assessment, and independent final inclusion decisions.

Responsibilities in the Submission and Peer-Review Process — Responsibilities in the Submission and Peer-Review Process. Establishes: Editors retain final responsibility for editorial decisions and confidentiality.

limitations

What the evidence does not establish

The handbook governs systematic-review study selection, not a universal editorial workflow or machine reviewer.

The recommendation does not define an agentic review schema or prove review quality.

This route must not claim duplicate research records.

This route must not claim unlabelled machine authorship.

relationships

Related definitions and applications

graphEdges: https://publish.mahastrategies.com/docs/editorial-workflow

same-topic-application: https://publish.mahastrategies.com/agentic-publishing/editorial-review/example

same-topic-application: https://publish.mahastrategies.com/agentic-publishing/editorial-review/machine-interface

same-topic-application: https://publish.mahastrategies.com/agentic-publishing/editorial-review/governance

property-home: https://publish.mahastrategies.com/

bounded answers

Questions this page can answer

What does Editorial Review mean in this bounded context?

Editorial Review, in this template, is limited to the following inspected scope. Documented search, title/abstract screening, full-text assessment, and independent final inclusion decisions. Editors retain final responsibility for editorial decisions and confidentiality. The answer carries the source boundaries forward and does not infer authority from a neighboring topic.

Which inspected sources support this template answer?

Cochrane Handbook, Chapter 4: Searching for and selecting studies (version 6.5, updated March 2025), at Sections 4.5, 4.6.3 and 4.6.4, supports documented search, title/abstract screening, full-text assessment, and independent final inclusion decisions. Responsibilities in the Submission and Peer-Review Process (living recommendation inspected 2026-09-06), at Responsibilities in the Submission and Peer-Review Process, supports editors retain final responsibility for editorial decisions and confidentiality.

What does the evidence not establish?

The handbook governs systematic-review study selection, not a universal editorial workflow or machine reviewer. The recommendation does not define an agentic review schema or prove review quality. Property boundary: This route may apply release; it cannot redefine or inherit the authority of its canonical owner.

Which definition or canonical owner must be read first?

This page is the local agentic-publishing definition for its topic. Related applications may depend on it but may not silently redefine it.

What source, policy, implementation, or release change would require revision?

Re-evaluate this page when a cited source, locator, governing instrument, local implementation, or canonical definition changes. Publication also requires a matching exact-revision review and active canonical release.